PREECURSOR
AI consulting use case

AI consulting for knowledge retrieval and RAG

Retrieval-grounded assistants that answer from your own knowledge — cited, current, and aware of who's allowed to see what.

← All AI consulting use cases
The problem

Why knowledge retrieval (rag) is hard to get right

Your answers exist — in wikis, tickets, contracts, and the heads of a few senior people — but finding them takes a search expedition or a Slack interruption. Naive RAG demos well and fails in production: stale content, missing citations, and answers that ignore who's allowed to see a document. The challenge is retrieval that stays fresh, cites its sources, respects permissions, and is actually grounded rather than guessing.

How we build it
01
Retrieval that stays fresh
Ingestion and indexing tied to your live sources, so the assistant answers from the current document, not last quarter's copy.
02
Citations and grounding checks
Every answer carries source links, and grounding evals catch the cases where the model would otherwise wander off-document.
03
Permission-aware access
Retrieval respects your access controls, so an answer never leaks content the asker isn't entitled to see.
04
Evaluation against real questions
Eval sets built from the questions your people actually ask, run on every change so quality is measured, not assumed.
The outcome

People get a cited, current answer in seconds instead of a search expedition — grounded in the right documents, scoped to what each person is allowed to see.

Put AI to work on knowledge retrieval (rag)

Bring us the metric you need to move. We will tell you what we would build, how long it takes, and what it is worth.

See our work